Jorg & Gloria Beyeler own 1100 acres (445 hectares) of land south of Minto and west of Grand Lake. It has waterfront at Sypher Cove, an old growth area along Sypher Brook, a significant moose habitat in boggy areas, and borders on the Grand Lake Meadows Protected Area.
Jorg is a forester and currently owns a forestry business. They have owned part of their woodlot since 1982, with an additional purchase of land in 2001.
Their main objectives for their woodlot include decreasing the risk from Spruce budworm, increase the number and variety of climate adaptive tree species, and maintain a healthy ecosystem.
Location: Windy Haven Lane, off Route 690 (Pondstream Road), Grand Lake, NB
Sites & access: 45.991625; -66.057745
Site conditions:
-
On the shore of Grand Lake, potential for strong wind
-
Evidence of a biodiverse ecosystem
-
there were tracks and/or scat evidence from rabbits, deer, bear, birds
-
a diverse understory of mushrooms, ferns, shrubs, etc.
-
many birds calls heard
-
dark soil, sandy-loam
-

Ground conditions:
-
Well-drained
-
Little to no slope
-
Good operability
History of site:
Little to no intervention has taken place, however some areas were pre-commercially thinned (especially in the Control area).

Treatments implemented by plot
AREA
TREATMENT
GOAL
SIZE in hectares (acres)
CONTROL
None
n/a
0.3 (0.74)
TRADITIONAL
Shelter-wood cut to retain good quality white pine. Remove all balsam fir, spruce and poor quality hardwoods. Work was completed using a single-grip harvester and porter system
To salvage fir and spruce volume before lost to maturity and encourage white pine regeneration
0.6 (1.48)
CLIMATE ADAPTIVE
Remove all balsam fir, spruce and poor quality hardwoods. Retain white pine where present. Plant red oak seedlings in openings, and protect from browse with protective sleeve. Work was completed using a single-grip harvester and porter system
To increase diversity of climate adaptive species through planting of red oak seedlings and acorns
0.4 (0.99)
Total site area: 1.3 ha (3.21 acres)
Timber volume per area
pre and post treatment
AREA
2021 pre-treatment
2021 post-treatment
2024 update
CONTROL
27 m3 (8.9 cords)
27 m3 (8.9 cords)
40 m3 (18.51 cords)
133 m3 (56.6 cords)
93 m3 (33.44 cords)
89 m3 (21.03 cords)
TRADITIONAL
CLIMATE ADAPTIVE
103 m3 (48.03 cords)
48 m3 (22.39 cords)
50 m3 (19.24 cords)
Summary of timber volume by tree species
pre and post treatments
Volume in m3 (cords)
SPECIES
Spruce
Balsam fir
White pine
Red maple
White birch
Oak
TOTAL
CONTROL
2021 pre
2021 post
0 (0)
2 (1)
5 (0.9)
19 (10.28)
1 (0)
0 (0)
27 m3
(8.9 cords)
0 (0)
2 (1)
5 (0.9)
19 (10.28)
1 (0)
0 (0)
27 m3
(8.9 cords)
1 (0.6)
7 (3.26)
8 (1.55)
23 (12.38)
1 (0.72)
0 (0)
40 m3
(18.51 cords)
2024
TRADITIONAL
2021 pre
2021 post
8 (3.44)
25 (11.04)
77 (29.62)
19 (10.28)
4 (2.4)
0 (0)
133 m3
(56.6 cords)
0 (0)
0 (0)
77 (29.62)
12 (6.42)
4 (2.4)
0 (0)
93 m3
(33.44 cords)
CLIMATE ADAPTIVE
2021 pre
2021 post
20 (9.14)
29 (12.88)
22 (8.6)
18 (9.92)
8 (4.36)
6 (3.13)
103 m3
(48.03 cords)
0 (0)
0 (0)
22 (8.6)
12 (6.3)
8 (4.36)
6 (3.13)
48 m3
(22.39 cords)
0 (0)
0 (0)
22 (4.23)
16 (8.86)
6 (3.05)
6 (3.1)
50 m3
(19.24 cords)
0 (0)
0 (0)
77 (14.64)
12 (6.39)
0 (0)
0 (0)
89 m3
(21.03 cords)
2024
2024
Regeneration Summary
sample plot size: 5 m2
Data is presented as the percentage of each species found in the plots.
The density of the seedlings is reprepresented in seedling per hectare (seedlings/ha).
CONTROL
2024 %
future
0
7
1
91
0
1
0
100 %
58,000 +
seedlings/ha
TBD
TRADITIONAL
2024 %
future
23
3
0
74
0
0
0
100%
100,000 +
seedlings/ha
TBD
CLIMATE ADAPTIVE
2024 %
future
2
6
4
29
42
0
17
100 %
52,000 +
seedlings/ha
TBD
SPECIES
Spruce
Balsam fir
White pine
Red maple
White birch
Oak
Poplar
TOTAL
Average density
2020 answers
What has the woodlot been used for in the past (e.g. timber harvesting, firewood, farmland, been left wild and free)?
It is primarily a timber production property with approximately 92% productive forest land with the special features as explained above. The property has been managed extensively over the past 37 years with most of the property under active management.
What are your short-term goals for your woodlot (next 7 years)?
1. Reduce risks to the current threat by the Spruce Budworm by harvesting mature stands that have pre-dominantly Balsam Fir.
2. Complete an upgrading of the road network for the property.
3. Actively introduce and increase the range of red oak and bur oak species on the property by planting acorns and seedlings over the next few years.
4. Complete all the necessary follow-up activities and treatments from the recent 6 years of various types of harvest treatments.
5. Re-establish the trail network that may have been impacted by the harvest treatments over the past six years.
What are your mid-term goals for your woodlot (7–35 years)?
1. Create a succession plan to ensure the continuous management of the property within our family as I mature into older age.
2. Achieve a diversification of revenue sources from the woodlot; along with our other properties to reduce the dependence of harvesting timber to generate income.
3. Gradually shift the age class structure and also create a higher percentage of age class diversity within stands during this period.
4. Increase the percentage of ecosystem types and stands that become un-even aged and partially harvested on an approximate 15 years entry cycle.
5. Increase the woodlot’s potential to become resilient to the changing climate by adapting our management practices during this period.
What are your long-term goals for your woodlot (35+ years)?
1. Achieving and maintaining a long-term sustainable harvest level using multiple harvest treatments that diversify the harvest entry regimes and also maintaining a consistent forest growth and health across all productive forest areas.
2. Consistently increase the financial value of the woodlot into the future.
3. Maintain ecosystem biodiversity by achieving a reasonable balance of healthy forest conditions on the productive forest areas as well as maintaining some old growth ecosystems all of which would benefit wildlife flora and fauna as natural habitats.
Have you previously taken your woodlot’s ability to adapt to future changing climate conditions into consideration?
Yes, I am well aware of the need to create future climate change resiliency on this this woodlot and on all my woodlot properties. This includes aspects of climate change such as temperature warming, changes in weather volatility; wind events, greater threats from hurricanes, severe rain events, drought periods, changing frost conditions and a gradual reduction in winter cold temperatures. All these factors ultimately affect species range changes, insect and disease threats, wildfire risks, surface water movement and run off, ground water table changes as examples.
That’s a long way of saying yes, I have been making gradually adjustments to property and forest management procedures to hopefully create more resiliency on my properties by adaptive management.
Are you currently aware of what future modelling shows for NB’s climate conditions?
Yes, but haven’t really updated my knowledge in the last few years.
Do you think your woodlot will be resilient to NB’s changing climate conditions? Why?
Well, I definitely hope so, but the uncertainty regarding the rapidly changing climate conditions will create risks that are hard to predict. The main aspects of changes to our management practices involve focusing on species that will be more resilient in a warmer climate, changing the forest structure diversity with longer rotations and greater species diversity, improving surface water management on woodlot road networks, and protecting stand treatments from severe wind events as much as possible.
Observations 2024
3 years after initial treatments
CONTROL
-
The regeneration is less abundant, and mainly Red Maple.
-
Crown closure is 75+%
TRADITIONAL
-
Red Maple regeneration is very tiny.
-
Spruce, Balsam Fir and natural Red Oak are present, but not in large numbers.
-
Very few patches of White Pine regeneration, mostly Red Maple.
-
Very little Raspberry content.
-
Blowdowns of Red Maple and Larch.
-
Crown closure is 50-75%
CLIMATE ADAPTIVE
-
Abundance of Raspberries.
-
Good regeneration of Red Maple, White Pine, White Birch, Red Oak (both ones that were planted, and natural), Balsam Fir, Poplar, Spruce, Larch.
-
A few standing dead White Birch left from harvest, however all other trees are healthy.
-
Crown closure is 75+%
Future monitoring updates will be posted here.
Conrad and Elspeth Leroux own 487 acres of land off of Route 580 in Carleton County. They first bought a section of the woodlot in 1978. Conrad is retired and enjoys the peacefulness of his woodlot. He wants to increase the health, diversity and resilience of his woodlot while improving it’s timber value at the same time.
Location: Route 580, Windsor Settlement, Carleton County, NB
access: 46.405942; -67.409535
sites: 46.405932; -67.420517
Site conditions:
-
Softwood height: 2-3 metres
-
Hardwood height: 5-6 metres
-
Predominantly hardwood area on slight rocky slope with southern exposure.
-
A few mature softwoods, mostly younger sugar maple, red maple, poplar and cherry
-
Fast growth due to soil fertility
-
Some ledge outcrops under shallow soil
-
Some areas of poor drainage
-
Regeneration too young to provide timber volume (M3 or cords), so stems per hectare (stems/ha) were used instead.

Ground conditions:
-
Well-drained
-
South-east slope
-
Good operability
History of site:
Formerly cleared farmland (before the 1970’s). One part of the woodlot was used as a Christmas tree plantation, and after they stopped selling Christmas trees, the remaining plantation was left to grow on its own. Another section had a Red pine plantation that was harvested in 2018/19. The area where the case study site is located was clear cut about 20 years ago.

This woodlot site was measured differently than other sites. Because it was a previously clear cut area, the entire site was very homogenous throughout. Sample plots were taken throughout the entire area to determine the starting timber volume calcultions.
Treatments implemented by plot
AREA
Control
Traditional
TREATMENT
None
Pre-commercially thin favouring traditional softwood species retaining hardwoods where no softwoods are present.
GOAL
n/a
Timber volume.
SIZE in hectares (acres)
0.4 (0.99)
0.6 (1.48)
Pre-commercially thin favouring climate adaptive species such as sugar maple, and favouring hardwoods over softwoods. (i.e. White birch over balsam fir as in next rotation fir will regenerate in the shade and once again dominate whereas white birch will not be able to re-establish under the canopy of existing trees.
Climate adaptive
To create favourable growing conditions for the climate adaptive species and minimize balsam fir. content.
0.7 (1.73)
Total site area: 1.7 ha (4.2 acres)
Timber volume per area *
pre and post treatment
* due to the small size of the trees when the data was recorded, this site was measured for density, not volume, therefore the data is in 'stems per hectare' (stems/ha)
AREA
2021 pre-treatment
2021 post-treatment
2024 update
22,939.5
22,939.5
22,939.5
CONTROL
22,939.5
2378.0
2833
TRADITIONAL
22,939.5
2502.0
2501
CLIMATE ADAPTIVE
Summary of timber volume by tree species* (2021 and 2024)
pre and post treatments
*Volume in stems / ha
SPECIES
Spruce
Balsam fir
Cedar
Sugar maple
Red maple
Yellow birch
White birch
Beech
Trembling aspen
Largetooth aspen
Ash
Ironwood
Pin cherry
TOTAL
125.0
1312.0
62.5
3000.0
3313.0
188.0
3250.0
2500.0
3032.0
3032.5
750.0
750.0
1625.0
22,939.5
125.0
1312.0
62.5
3000.0
3313.0
188.0
3250.0
2500.0
3032.0
3032.5
750.0
750.0
1625.0
22,939.5
before
after
2024
CONTROL
125.0
1312.0
62.5
3000.0
3313.0
188.0
3250.0
2500.0
3032.0
3032.5
750.0
750.0
1625.0
22,939.5
2021
2021
125.0
1312.0
62.5
3000.0
3313.0
188.0
3250.0
2500.0
3032.0
3032.5
750.0
750.0
1625.0
22,939.5
0.0
688.0
0.0
250.0
188.0
0.0
1125.0
0.0
32.0
32.0
63.0
0.0
0.0
2378.0
after
after
2024
TRADITIONAL
0.0
417.0
0.0
83.0
250.0
0.0
1833.0
0.0
250.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2833.0
2021
2021
2024
125.0
1312.0
62.5
3000.0
3313.0
188.0
3250.0
2500.0
3032.0
3032.5
750.0
750.0
1625.0
22,939.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
375.0
438.0
0.0
188.0
188.0
875.0
438.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2502.0
CLIMATE ADAPTIVE
before
after
0.0
0.0
0.0
583.0
167.0
0.0
0.0
167.0
417.0
1167.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2501.0
2021
2021
Regeneration Summary (starting in 2024)
sample plot size: 5 m2
Data is presented as the percentage (%) of each species found in the plots.
SPECIES
Spruce
Balsam fir
Cedar
Sugar maple
Red maple
Yellow birch
White birch
Beech
Trembling aspen
Largetooth aspen
Ash
Ironwood
Pin cherry
TOTAL
CONTROL
2024
future
1
6
0
13
14
1
14
11
13
13
3
3
7
100%
TBD
TRADITIONAL
2024
future
0
15
0
3
9
0
65
0
9
0
0
0
0
100%
TBD
CLIMATE ADAPTIVE
2024
future
0
0
0
23
7
0
0
7
17
47
0
0
0
100%
TBD
2020 answers
What has the woodlot been used for in the past (e.g. timber harvesting, firewood, farmland, been left wild and free)?
Prior to the 1970’s, about half was cleared land used for farming. After our acquisition, part was operated as a Christmas tree plantation. This was eventually stopped due to market conditions and time constraints. The remaining trees were left to grow. Those and the Red Pine plantation were harvested in 2018/19 and the ground was scarified in 2020. Other former fields have almost all reverted to commercial and non-commercial forest species of varying ages. During our tenure, much of the wooded areas have been cut. Some clear-cut, some selective thinning cuts, with help from CVWPA.
What are your short-term goals for your woodlot (next 7 years)?
Replant the 2018/19 clear-cut area of Balsam Fir and Red Pine (with spruce and white pine).
To include a component of White Pine in a manner which will facilitate control of inevitable weevil attack
Pre-commercial thinning of hardwood regeneration in areas (that were previously) clear cut on Lot 58.
Attempt to establish suitable hardwood replacement for the expected loss of all ash trees due to emerald ash borer.
Presently attempting establishment of Red Oak by seeding of acorns on a trial basis.
Monitor beech regeneration for feasibility of encouraging strains resistant to the bark disease which infects the majority of beech trees.
Considering my age, arrange for the orderly transfer of ownership of the woodlot, hopefully within the family.
What are your mid-term goals for your woodlot (7–35 years)?
I would hope that the next owners are family members who will manage for a well-stocked forest of various age groups and diverse species native to the Acadian Forest or suitable for expected climate changes.
What are your long-term goals for your woodlot (35+ years)?
Basically, that the woodlot be fully stocked, tending more to climax species and aiming for a future harvest of greater value due to larger trees of higher quality. It is very difficult to predict what will be in demand for future markets and what future strains will occur from disease and climate change. The wisest approach will probably be to avoid reliance on one or a few products. Monoculture is very risky.
Have you previously taken your woodlot’s ability to adapt to future changing climate conditions into consideration?
No. Only in the last year, or so. The Federation’s seminar in Fredericton last year on this topic was an eye-opener for me. I now realize that this is important.
Do you think your woodlot will be resilient to NB’s changing climate conditions? Why?
There will always be trees of some kind in the woodlot. Will they be healthy? Will they be of commercial value? Will the species mix change? Will we continue to lose species due to imported diseases? Who can say for sure? But I do believe that we should plan and act based on best available information and forecasts.
Observations 2024
3 years after initial treatments
CONTROL
-
observed some regeneration of Sugar Maple, Red Maple, and Balsam Fir.
-
heights averaged 6 metres.
TRADITIONAL
-
recorded 1 dead White Birch and 2 White Birch with broken tops.
-
observed regeneration included Sugar Maple, Red Maple, Striped Maple, White Birch, and Balsam Fir.
-
heights 6.5 - 7 metres
CLIMATE ADAPTIVE
-
observed regeneration of Sugar Maple, Red Maple, Largetooth Aspen, White Ash, and Beech.
-
Heights averaged 6.5 - 10 metres.
Future monitoring updates will be posted here.
McCrea Farms, owned by Jim McCrea and his daughter and son-in-law, Nancy and Bruce Colpitts, has belonged to the family for 80 years.
The PID (property ID) the case study is located on consists of 300 acres, but their total woodlot is over 5000 acres. They use the woodlot for timber harvesting, firewood, farmland, and tourism trails.
Location: 2670 Route 705, Shannon, NB
Site conditions:
-
stand age = 42 years (in 2021)
-
75% crown closure
-
Abundant balsam fir regeneration
-
Spruce is scattered

Ground conditions:
-
Mossy
-
Heavily shaded
-
Occasional rockiness
History of site:
The land was farmed in the past but has been managed for a mixture of values: farming, recreation, hunting, tourism trails, maple syrup, firewood and timber. The area the case study site is located was pre-commercially thinned in early 1990’s.

Treatments implemented by plot
AREA
TREATMENT
GOAL
SIZE in hectares (acres)
CONTROL
None
n/a
0.4 (0.99)
TRADITIONAL
Remove all balsam fir retaining spruce where possible.
To provide improved growing conditions to allow the spruce to develop into higher quality products such as sawlogs.
0.5 (1.24)
CLIMATE ADAPTIVE
Remove all balsam fir, retaining spruce where possible, keeping in mind possibility of wind creating blowdowns. *
To restore diversity to the site and minimize the balsam fir content.
0.85 (2.10)
* Note: the original recommendation was to remove the spruce as well due to risk of strong winds blowing over the shallow-rooted spruce trees once the balsam fir was removed, however, the owner decided to keep them for now. Several months after harvesting the site was dragged to disturb mineral soil to create favourable seedbeds for spruce regeneration. To create species diversity, fill planting with white pine (observed in the area), maple or seeding with acorns or other species will follow. (update 2023)
Total site area: 1.75 ha (4.32 acres)
Unlike the other three case study sites, no data was collected post-treatment in 2021 due to weather-related complications that continued into the following year. This site is at working farm and we did not want to hinder their operations in any way. Measurements were taken in 2024.
Timber volume per area
pre and post treatment
Measurements are recorded in m3 (cords)
AREA
2021 pre-treatment
2024
27 m3 (8.9 cords)
27 m3 (8.9 cords)
40 m3 (18.51 cords)
CONTROL
CONTROL
65.61 (34.31)
65.61 (34.31)
133 m3 (56.6 cords)
93 m3 (33.44 cords)
89 m3 (21.03 cords)
TRADITIONAL
TRADITIONAL
82.00 (42.88)
10 (3.6)
103 m3 (48.03 cords)
48 m3 (22.39 cords)
50 m3 (19.24 cords)
CLIMATE ADAPTIVE
CLIMATE ADAPTIVE
139.40 (72.90)
36 (19.22)
Summary of timber volume by tree species
pre and post treatments
Volume in m3 (cords)
SPECIES
Spruce
Balsam fir
Cedar
Hemlock
Red maple
White birch
White pine
Yellow birch
TOTAL
CONTROL
2021 pre
2024
0.69 (3.22)
45.26 (20.57)
1.37 (0.59)
1.14 (0.55)
6.63 (3.66)
10.52 (5.72)
0
0
65.61
(34.31)
0.69 (3.22)
45.26 (20.57)
1.37 (0.59)
1.14 (0.55)
6.63 (3.66)
10.52 (5.72)
0
0
65.61
(34.31)
TRADITIONAL
2021 pre
2024
0.86 (4.03)
56.57 (25.71)
1.71 (0.74)
1.43 (0.69)
8.29 (4.57)
13.14 (7.14)
0
0
82.00
(42.88)
0
3 (1.2)
0
0
0
3 (1.63)
4 (0.77)
0
10
(3.6)
CLIMATE ADAPTIVE
2021 pre
2024
1.46 (6.85)
96.17 (43.71)
2.91 (1.26)
2.43 (1.17)
14.09 (7.77)
22.34 (12.14 )
0
0
139.40 (72.90)
4 (1.78)
0
0
0
7 (3.89)
25 (13.55)
0
0
36
(19.22)
Regeneration Summary
sample plot size: 5 m2
Data is presented as the percentage (%) of basal area of each species found in the plots.
The density of the seedlings is reprepresented in seedling per hectare (seedlings/ha).
CONTROL
2024 %
future
TBD
TRADITIONAL
2024 %
future
10
85
0
0
0
5
0
0
100 %
20,000
seedlings/ha
TBD
CLIMATE ADAPTIVE
2024 %
future
1
78
0
0
18
3
0
0
100 %
78,000
seedlings/ha
TBD
SPECIES
Spruce
Balsam fir
Cedar
Hemlock
Red maple
White birch
White pine
Yellow birch
TOTAL
2020 answers
What has the woodlot been used for in the past (e.g. timber harvesting, firewood, farmland, been left wild and free)?
Timber harvesting, firewood, farmland and tourism trails.
What are your short-term goals for your woodlot (next 7 years)? / What are your mid-term goals for your woodlot (7–35 years)?
Capture fir mortality and generate revenue while keeping other goals and objectives, like wildlife and tourism, in mind.
What are your long-term goals for your woodlot (35+ years)?
Maintain a sustainable source of income.
Have you previously taken your woodlot’s ability to adapt to future changing climate conditions into consideration?
Partially. We have been trying to capture fir mortality for over 5 years.
Are you currently aware of what future modelling shows for NB’s climate conditions?
Aware of some of the impacts; decrease in fir, maybe better for some hardwood.
Do you think your woodlot will be resilient to NB’s changing climate conditions? Why?
Not without some different practices. I think with time and consideration of different harvesting and silviculture we could put ourselves in a better position. There is a lot of land to keep up with the fir that is dying so we will not be successful everywhere, but will prioritize the woodlot, taking into account all of our objectives.
Observations 2024
3 years after initial treatments
CONTROL
-
Very little change - no blowdowns noted.
-
Crown closure 75 - 80%.
-
Minimal to no regeneration.
TRADITIONAL
-
Estimate 90% of site covered in raspberries and/or grasses.
-
Most of the Spruce and White Birch left after harvest had blown down in the winter/early spring of 2024.
CLIMATE ADAPTIVE
-
Trees left after harvest are growing fairly well.
-
A few stem breakages and blowdowns of White Birch
-
Some areas heavy to raspberries.
Future monitoring updates will be posted here.
Hazen and Karen McCrea have owned their 200+ acre woodlot on Route 180 in South Tetagouche for over 30 years. Hazen particularly values the tree plantation on their woodlot.
The main objectives for their woodlot include increasing timber production and maintaining wildlife habitat.
Location: South Tetagouche , NB
Site conditions:
-
Softwoods are mature to over-mature
-
Hardwoods are mature
-
Little to no regeneration present
-
Blowdowns, stem breakages, broken tops, up-rooted trees are present
-
Regeneration consists of mainly red maple with occasional sugar maple, stunted and suppressed balsam fir and spruce also present
-
Wildlife signs of moose and bear were observes along with small animals and many bird species

Ground conditions:
-
Moderate drainage
-
Good operability
-
No slope or rockiness
History of site:
Little to no invention has taken place, however an occasional old stump is present.

Treatments implemented by plot
AREA
TREATMENT
GOAL
SIZE in hectares (acres)
CONTROL
None
n/a
0.4 (0.99)
TRADITIONAL
Clear-cut the area. Remove all merchantable timber. Reassess site after 5 years.
To salvage volume as stand is over-mature with moderate to poor health.
0.5 (1.24)
CLIMATE ADAPTIVE
Remove all softwoods. Retain the sugar maple and yellow birch. Scuff up the soil as much as possible during harvest to create favourable seedbeds for birch and maple regeneration. Harvesting completed with a tracked harvester to reach into the the area from the sides thus not creating trails.
To encourage the establishment of long lived climate adaptive species using existing mature trees as seed source.
0.4 (0.99)
Total site area: 1.3 ha (3.21 acres)
Timber volume per area
pre and post treatment
AREA
2021 pre-treatment
2021 post-treatment
2024 update
CONTROL
56.5 m3 (28.2 cords)
56.5 m3 (28.2 cords)
55 m3 (26.7 cords)
0
TRADITIONAL
CLIMATE ADAPTIVE
58 m3 (29.7 cords)
20 m3 10.6 cords)
Summary of timber volume by tree species
pre and post treatments
Volume in m3 (cords)
SPECIES
Spruce
Balsam fir
Cedar
Red maple
White birch
Yellow birch
Ash
Oak
TOTAL
CONTROL
2021 pre
2021 post
10.5 (4.8)
16 (7.1)
3 (1.35)
9 (5.15)
3 (1.7)
14 (7.6)
1 (0.5)
0
56.5 (28.2)
10.5 (4.8)
16 (7.1)
3 (1.35)
9 (5.15)
3 (1.7)
14 (7.6)
1 (0.5)
0
56.5 (28.2)
2024
TRADITIONAL
2021 pre
2021 post
18 (8.3)
16 (7.1)
3 (1.4)
5 (3)
0
11 (5.9)
2 (1)
0
55 (26.7)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
CLIMATE ADAPTIVE
2021 pre
2021 post
3 (1.3)
16 (7.1)
3 (1.3)
13 (7.3
6 (3.4)
17 (9.3)
0
0
58 (29.7)
3 (1.3)
0
0
0
0
17 (9.3)
0
0
20 (10.6)
2024
2024
Regeneration Summary
sample plot size: 5 m2
Data is presented as the percentage of each species found in the plots.
The density of the seedlings is reprepresented in seedling per hectare (seedlings/ha).
CONTROL
2024 %
future
TBD
TRADITIONAL
2024 %
future
40
0
0
0
0
60
0
0
0
100%
??
TBD
CLIMATE ADAPTIVE
2024 %
future
0
0
0
83
0
0
0
17
0
100%
??
TBD
SPECIES
Spruce
Balsam fir
Cedar
Red maple
Sugar Maple
White birch
Yellow birch
Beech
Oak
TOTAL
Average density
0
13
0
28
13
46
0
0
0
100%
58,000+
seedlings/ha
2020 answers
What has the woodlot been used for in the past (e.g. timber harvesting, firewood, farmland, been left wild and free)?
All of the above.
What are your short-term goals for your woodlot (next 7 years)?
Improve.
What are your mid-term goals for your woodlot (7–35 years)?
Improve.
What are your long-term goals for your woodlot (35+ years)?
Improve.
Have you previously taken your woodlot’s ability to adapt to future changing climate conditions into consideration?
Yes.
Are you currently aware of what future modelling shows for NB’s climate conditions?
Not all of it.
Do you think your woodlot will be resilient to NB’s changing climate conditions? Why?
No, I’m going to lose all my (balsam) fir.
Observations 2024
3 years after initial treatments
CONTROL
-
Large amount of natural regeneration present. Very tiny Red Maple regen. Balsam Fir regen only present as advanced stunted regen.
-
Crown closure 75%
TRADITIONAL
-
Tall heavy grasses, Alders and Raspberries present.
-
Little to no regeneration present.
-
Goldenrod, Aster also observed.
CLIMATE ADAPTIVE
-
Although not showing up in the plot, Spruce, Cedar, Balsam Fir and Yellow Birch regeneration were observed in fairly good numbers depending on light.
-
Some areas had advanced Balsam Fir present with long leaders.
Future monitoring updates will be posted here.